Published within a few weeks of each other, Daniel Krauss, Crown Professor of Psychology and George R. Roberts Fellow, has co-authored two new books and a journal article. The first, Forensic and Legal Psychology, fifth edition (Macmillan Learning, pub.), was co-authored with Mark Costanzo, CMC Professor of Psychological Science.
Under the leadership of Rachel Fenning, Professor of Psychological Science and Director of the Claremont Autism Center, the Center has been granted official status as a regional center vendor for social-skills services for clients ages 6-21. “This is a huge milestone for us and will enhance our ability to support children and families in our local community,” Fenning said.
Mark Costanzo, Professor of Psychological Science, published the fifth edition of Forensic and Legal Psychology (Macmillan Learning, pub.), co-authored with Daniel Krauss, Crown Professor of Psychology and George R. Roberts Fellow.
Professor John Pitney was quoted in an article discussing the political traction California Governor Gavin Newsom has gained.
Professor John Pitney shared his insights in an article on President Donald Trump’s reaction to a recent Supreme Court decision on nationwide judicial injunctions from federal courts.
Professor John Pitney was quoted in an explanation of the political dilemma faced by both the Democratic and Republican parties concerning the political risks of a conflict between the U.S. and Iran.
Professor John Pitney was quoted in the political and strategic analysis of the U.S. military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities. The article addresses the potential impact of this decision on key Republican figures.
Professor John Pitney provided commentary on California Governor Gavin Newsom’s rising national profile and his potential candidacy for the 2028 presidential election.
Professor Lisa Koch provided her insights on the impact of the U.S. withdrawing from the Iran nuclear deal, helping demystify debates on the efficiency of the agreement.
Professor John Pitney provided observations on the political risks lawmakers face when met with the recurring problem of passing fruitless votes in Congress.
